Monday, March 9, 2026

Nicodemus: How He Moved from Courage to Conviction to Proclamation as He Followed the God of Compassion (John 3) [1]

 


                                     https://paintingvalley.com/images/nicodemus-painting-16.jpg

Did you ever get in one of those binds where you really want to do something, but you’re scared to do it for some reason?

Maybe you’re worried about public opinion.

You know, you’re in one of those meetings where everyone is uncomfortable and watching everybody else to see how everybody else is going to react. Those in charge are carefully manipulating the whole scenario to move everyone to the conclusion that they want. Yes, they’re moving their agenda along smoothly – but you’ve got a growing conviction that you don’t feel where it’s going is right.

Some eloquent speaker is in the process of painting a glorious picture of promises about how, if you all just go along with this, everything is going to be wonderful. You want to object – protest, even – but it’s scary.  You feel so much pressure - the expectation to acquiesce is like a steam shovel pushing you toward the pit of agreement. You’re teetering on the edge ready for freefall. You look around – it looks like everybody else is toppling in. And the rest are looking back at you in silent disapproval that you haven’t agreed with them already and let them get on with the rest of the agenda!

Or maybe it’s even more intimate a situation than that. Maybe there’s someone you know you want to reach out to – but everybody else shuns them – they are on the outs – Out with the Out-crowd, if there ever was one. Well, the people-everyone-admires have written this loser off. If you reach out and make that social pariah your friend – well, public opinion says, “People are known by the company they keep,” so you’ll immediately have “Loser” written all over your forehead too. You will instantly be dismissed by the people-who-count – or worse than that – you’ll be mocked, or worst of all – persecuted.

Well, here was a guy with both problems.

Nicodemus—a Person of Courage

He had worked long and hard to gain the respect of his fellow Jews. In fact, he had achieved the highest religious honor a lay person could attain – he was a member of the Sanhedrin, meaning literally “the seats together” – or those who together sit in the place of decision-making and rule the people. In short, the Sanhedrin was the supreme council, comprised of seventy one elders and its power was formidable in terms of making laws, rendering judgments, and carrying those out. It traced its origin back to Moses’ day, where it claimed it descended from the advisors who helped him rule (for example, in Num 11:10-24) and then it claimed it was reorganized under Ezra right after the exile, and then again at Jamnia, the farthest city in the northwest of Judah during the First Maccabean revolt against Greek rule. In other words, the Sanhedrin was an exalted entity –- and, next to the emperor, and whoever was the latest ruler of the Jews, Herod or some Roman Procurator – its word was law.

You don’t jeopardize your position on a governmental body as powerful as this one – and you certainly don’t compromise your reputation with your fellow rulers. So here was this man, Nicodemus, and he had a major problem.

He was fascinated by Jesus. He was intrigued by his miracles, astonished at his teaching, drawn to his charismatic person – he wanted to know more…

But Jesus was as out as he could be with everybody in power – all the people-that-count.

That Nicodemus was scared was a no-brainer.  He had a lot to lose. You know, we rarely think about the courage of Nicodemus as he reached out to this “Social Pariah” – this rebel from Galilee. We scoff at the fact that he went to Jesus by night. How many of us would have gone at any point – day or night?

Well, Jesus made no secret about where he usually hung out. So, one night Nicodemus went to see him – maybe at the Garden at Gethsemane, maybe at John’s Jerusalem relatives’ home, or at Mark’s mother’s house, but here he comes approaching Jesus with humility and respect. 

He calls Jesus, “Teacher” (which is “Rabbi,” also meaning “Master,” it’s an honorary title of address).[2]

Then he makes an astounding confession.  He says: “We know that from God you have come [as] a teacher, because no one could do these works of power and signs that you do, if God were not with him” (John 3:2).[3]

That’s pretty revealing.  It displays what thinking people were already pondering – so even the Sanhedrin was not so monolithically opposed to Jesus as some might suppose.

On his side, Jesus, who could look through false flattery and see the heart - and also recognize a true inquiry when he heard one - accepts this person’s honest statement and begins to adjust Nicodemus’ perspective.

 1) First, Jesus tells him he has to abandon his old point of view – that’s no longer useful here.  Nicodemus will need to renovate his entire outlook: to be as if he were born once more as a whole new person with a whole new perspective. Why?  Because heavenly things cannot be understood with an earthly perspective (John 3:3-8).

2) Jesus has come from heaven – reminiscent of the bronze replica of the serpent that Moses raised up on a pole in Numbers 21:9, which rescued Israel by healing it from its punishment for its rebellion against God.  It was an account that Nicodemus, as a teacher of Israel himself, would have known well (John 3:14-15).

3) And now Jesus delivers his message right to the heart of Nicodemus. You see, Jesus had the power to look at the heart – that is, into the will - of each person who came to him and deliver the message that person most needed to hear – the one to which they would need to respond to enter his reign.

4) To Nicodemus, Jesus delivered one of the most beautiful messages in the entire New Testament.  He told him literally: “For, in this way, God loved the world, that the Only Begotten he gave, in order that all the ones believing in him would not perish (or die, or be lost, or be ruined), but may have life eternal” (John 3:16).

The message Jesus gave Nicodemus was about the great action of the compassionate heart of God. What Jesus was saying was this: Nicodemus, God loves you so much that he sent you me, the only child of God born on this earth. You, and all faithful Israel, were right to ignore all those pagan myths about Zeus fathering children, and also to ignore everybody else who came to you claiming God was their parent. I am the only one who has descended from the Father God who created this world.

But God didn’t send me to pass judgment on everyone, like you do regularly on the Sanhedrin. I am here to rescue the world (to save it, deliver it, preserve it, make it well). In fact, I’m not here to condemn anybody.  People who shun me have already condemned themselves. If they’d rather hide in their sins, they’ve chosen their own punishment.  That’s where they’ll stay forever.

    But, you, Nicodemus, although you have come at night, have come to me – out into the light of God’s scrutiny – to show, that what you yourself said about me in true, no one could do these works of power and signs that you do, if God were not with him (John 3:2).  

Now that is what Jesus implies to Nicodemus. 

To us, and probably to Nicodemus himself, he actually appears to have kind of crept over to see Jesus under complete cover of darkness, skulking in the shadows. But Jesus is so gracious with him.  He ignores appearances and looks at Nicodemus’ heart, at its potential. He builds on the fact that Nicodemus has come into the light of God’s redeeming presence, that Nicodemus is a person who has demonstrated a respectful, kind, and compassionate heart toward Jesus, respecting Jesus, acknowledging the good that Jesus does and says, and seeking to understand more.

Nicodemus Is Convicted as He Is Reminded of the God of Compassion

So, Jesus adjusts Nicodemus’ perspective and then holds up for him a model of profound compassion – the example of God, the great Creator of the world, so caring with us wayward children that God gives us God’s unique gift – the greatest gift God could give us – God’s only Child who is fully God and fully human – whom John tells us in his gospel—comes directly from the loving embrace of our heavenly Parent – to rescue us from the consequences of the evil we do (John 1:18).

No wonder Nicodemus has his heart so stirred within him that he becomes bolder and bolder even as the pressure to reject and persecute Jesus builds – he has glimpsed the beneficent facts of heaven.

Jesus is teaching Nicodemus about the compassionate heart of God – so profoundly caring that it gives up its greatest treasure for the benefit of rebellious people. The lesson is well learned, and Nicodemus will need to understand every aspect of it as the whole precarious situation changes, as conflict escalates between Jesus and the Sanhedrin. 

What’s happened is that the people, confronted with all the healings and godly teachings of Jesus, begin wavering in their once unquestioning support of their supreme ruling body. They start asking about Jesus in John 7:25-26: “Isn’t this the one they are seeking to kill, and here he is speaking openly and nobody’s speaking to him. Perhaps the rulers actually know that he’s the Christ?”

How do you imagine that’s going down with the people-who-count?

Just as bad as you think it is.

They have had enough of this upstart from nowhere, so they send the troopers out to get him – but even these enforcers hesitate when they hear what Jesus has to say.  When they come back empty-handed and apologetic, the temple authorities demand, “Why didn’t you bring him in?” The guards reply, “Never a human spoke in this way!” (John 7:45-46).

Nicodemus Proclaims the God of Compassion

And in the controversy that follows, Nicodemus seizes his opportunity to display his own compassionate heart.  He speaks up on behalf of this Social Pariah at the tensest moment one can imagine, knowing full well the kind of disapproval his advocacy is going to draw on himself.  But he says anyway: “Does our law condemn a human without first hearing from him and to find out what he is doing?” (John 7:51).

They shout him down: “Are you also from Galilee?” they snap at him.  “Check it out!  You’ll see from Galilee no prophet comes!” (John 7:52).

But he tried…

Within a short time events climax at the Passover – the guards are sent out once again and this time they arrest Jesus, a hasty trial is assembled, false witnesses are hired, the market place rabble is roused up in support, and Jesus is executed – all with whirlwind timing. 

The whole problem of this rebel has been dealt with – with deadly efficiency – or so they think…       

Nicodemus, however, has also been undergoing a swift series of changes inside himself.

He now has the beginning of a community of like-minded friends.  Nicodemus, with Joseph of Arimathea, another member of the Sanhedrin who had also been afraid of its power, not only defies the Supreme Council, but the two go over its head and boldly procure an audience with the Roman Governor, who himself had had misgivings about executing Jesus.  They gain custody of Jesus’ body (John 19:38).

Nicodemus buys 75 pounds of expensive burial spices (myrrh and aloes) and together they embalm Jesus’ body in the Jewish style and bury it publicly, so that everyone knows who did this and where they put the body (John 19:39-42).

Many traditions tell us that this is the start of a glorious ministry for Nicodemus, who continues as “a faithful follower of Jesus in later years.”[4]

The great German New Testament scholar Theodore Zahn speculates that “if the gradual acceptance of the gospel by Nicodemus, which John describes, terminated, as it undoubtedly did, in his reception into the membership of the Church, John could have learned from him what he recalls” about that night with Jesus.[5]  This might be why we have it in such careful detail in the Gospel written by John to still bless us as we read the Scriptures today.

 The Process of Transformation

So, how do you grow a compassionate heart within yourself and help someone else grow a compassionate heart?

1) Well, first, Nicodemus began by keeping his eyes and his mind open – noticing other people, what they said, what they did.

2) Second, he didn’t let the disapproval of his social set dictate his opinion for him.  His clique may have deemed others unworthy of notice, and ignored them, but Nicodemus noticed them. 

3) In fact, he gathered information on them.

4) Once he’d begun to make up his mind to extend compassion, he tried to intercede for fair treatment of others.  He may not have been successful, but he still tried to help.

5) Following his example, we might say that we should do what we can emotionally to help others, even if it means doing it in secret.

6) If we show respect to others, we can learn the truth about them.

7) Then we need to seek out a community of like-minded people that we ourselves know will think as we do, as Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea did.

8) And then together we can let our courage catch up with our conviction until we are able to make a bold public stand for what we think is right.

On Jesus’ side, he didn’t just ignore someone who came to him for help just because that person was a member of a social group that was oppressing him – in this case the privileged power mongers. Instead, Jesus looked at the intentions of this individual and saw the potential.  He built on that.

The first thing Jesus did after accepting him was to help him raise his consciousness.

Here Jesus worked by the wise rule of differentiating between acceptance and approval.  He accepted Nicodemus, but Jesus did not fall into the mistake of extending to him a blanket approval of everything he did and stood for (kowtowing to him because he was a Somebody), and Jesus did not make the mistake of excusing everything he did (thinking he was a victim of his circumstances and therefore to be deemed not responsible for whatever he did).  No.  Instead, Jesus accepted Nicodemus as a seeker and then began to change Nicodemus’ own perspective about himself.

Looking at Jesus’ example, we might say, we should build our work of raising our own consciousness and the consciousnesses of others on the characteristics of God, who is the ultimate example all of us should be following: a firm but compassionate God.

Jesus could tell at a glance what people were thinking, but, then, he was God-Among-Us.  We can’t, because we’re not! So, as we are working with someone, we should get to know them well enough to reach them where they are – to speak to the concerns of their hearts, as Jesus did with Nicodemus, using God’s great example of compassion to help Nicodemus emulate and imitate God and therefore develop his own sense of compassion.

Finally, Jesus encouraged Nicodemus in his good intentions, yes, but he did so with patience, so that the Holy Spirit could grow the convictions within him.

One thing you’ll notice is that Jesus didn’t go for the quick buck – You know, like: “Hey, you’re Nicodemus, aren’t you?  You’re a guy on the Sanhedrin.  Since you’re here, you know, you could do me a good turn. How about you keeping your ears open and reporting to my disciples anything you hear that might be jeopardizing to our great ministry? And, when you can, put in a good word or two for me…okay, buddy?”

Jesus doesn’t ask Nicodemus for anything.  Jesus concentrates solely on what will help Nicodemus and Nicodemus goes away with no strings put on him except those his own conscience has created. Jesus really displays a perfectly compassionate heart that has only others’ interests in mind - and no angles...

And that’s the example Nicodemus takes away and what he slowly grows into.

You see, it is the perfect example – the example of God – the One who truly displays the perfect heart of compassion.

And it is the one pure example we need to follow, if we are going to develop such a heart within ourselves and be of any use to others who also want to develop a truly compassionate heart. Amen.                               

Bill



[1] This blog is an adaption of a sermon preached at Pilgrim Church, Beverly, MA, Sept. 2, 2012.

[2] Barclay M. Newman, A Concise Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament, revised ed.  (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellischaft, 2010), 160.

[3] All the New Testament quotations are translated from the Greek by the author.

[4] Ronald Brownrigg, Who’s Who in the New Testament (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971), 319, col. 2.

[5] Theodor Zahn, Introduction to the New Testament, vol 111 (Minneapolis, MN: Klock and Klock Christian Publishers, 1977) 355, note 18.


 

Monday, February 9, 2026

What Is Truly “Strong” Leadership?

 

 Demonstration Jan. 26, 2026 in Santo Domingo, picture by Aída Besançon Spencer

Bill and I were eager to reach the Dominican Republic (DR) this past January so that we could learn about its newspapers’ views of President Donald Trump taking captive Venezuela’s self-asserted President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. Both the Dominican Republic and the coast of Venezuela share a significant African-Caribbean and Taino heritage, thus, their people have been friends for many years. Every January we hear a Venezuelan celebration down the street near us in Santo Domingo, although its propaganda has been heavily communistic. January 26. 2026 was no different, with protests on behalf of Maduro and Flores. But we wondered, what will Dominicans think of Donald Trump’s action this January 2026?

The Dominican President Luis Abinader announced that the DR never recognized Maduro’s presidency since he and his party had been voted out yet they refused to leave.[1] The newspaper Diario Libre explained that the Venezuelans were hesitant to parade publicly, fearful of reprisal from the Chavistas (named after Hugo Chávez),[2] but privately some were jubilant and others were uncertain about their future in the light of Trump’s actions.[3] Certainly, as their loved ones were slowly released from political prisons, they were very happy.[4] Many of the Venezuelans in the Dominican Republic were pleased that the dictator Maduro was finally restrained. News articles listed the many terrorist and criminal activities of Maduro, such as, systematically using the Venezuelan airports, diplomacy, armed forces, and family structures to convert the country into a platform for delivery of cocaine to the United States. He is reported as promoting narco-terrorism, allied with armed groups and criminal organizations described as terrorists. Not only was there the drug trade, but also the undermining of national security, armed violence, and transnational threats.[5]  From having belonged to one of the richest Latin American nations,[6] Venezuelans have dropped to the lowest minimum salary for its workers in all of South America and the Caribbean, to the equivalent of .44 cents US per month![7] President Maduro controlled all the powers of the state and systematically repressed all political opposition. Venezuelans in the United States, for example, Adriano Espaillat, member of the United States Congress (House of Representatives and President of the Hispanic Caucus of Congress), were also celebrating the removal of Maduro and his wife, but they were fearful of the precedent President Trump had set: making a significant decision without the awareness and approval of Congress, even though it was largely Republican. Congressman Espaillat adds that the United States does not allow armed military conflict without constitutional control. He rejects categorically the idea that the United States can or should govern Venezuela. Rather, he explains. “The Venezuelan community should govern Venezuela. Our role should be to accompany, facilitate diplomatic solutions, strengthen the international multilateral pressure and enable a democratic transition led by the Venezuelans themselves.” (“El pueblo venezolano debe gobernar Venezuela. Nuestro rol debe ser el de acompañar, facilitar soluciones diplomáticas, fortalecer la presión internacional multilateral y apoyar una transición democrática liderada por los propios venezolanos”).[8] The questions implicit in this precedent are: What is to keep the United States from interfering in every smaller country in each one’s internal affairs? The Venezuelans already have had elections in the past and the 30-day re-elections are crucial. Also, why must the United States demand the Venezuelans only purchase US goods and the USA only purchase Venezuelan oil?[9] Can we remove a dictator in a dictatorial fashion? Or, must we model and enlist community with those we are attempting to free? One step forward by President Trump is his public affirmation of two women leaders, Delcy Rodriquez and Maria Corina Machado.[10] In these public statements, he sends a positive message for Venezuelan rule and supports the critical role of wise female leadership (like Judge and Prophet Deborah).

As Christians we want to promote justice and subdue wrongdoing, but our preferred Christian model of leadership is not one that is dictatorial. Jesus did not favor dictatorial leadership at any level, as he said to brothers James and John, sons of Zebedee: “The ones being recognized as ruling over the Gentiles overpower (katakurieuō) them and their great ones exercise authority over (katechousiazō) them, but not thus among you….” Jesus’s “great” leadership was instead serving people, as Jesus did, when he came to give his life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:42-45). The key preposition to avoid is kata, “down” or “against.” We do not want to treat others as “below” us.[11]

The Apostle Paul also explained to the Corinthians that he did not lead like the overpowering “superapostles,” who showed their pseudo-strength by enslaving, consuming, taking advantage of, being haughty, and hitting others (2 Cor 11:20). These false apostles were deceitful, boasting in the labors of others, modeled after Satan, the illusory glorious but fallen angel (2 Cor 10:13-15; 11:3, 13-15). Rather, Paul modeled his and his coworkers’ leadership after the gentleness and humility of Christ (2 Cor 10:1). As Jesus was a ransom for many, Paul, out of love for those he served, suffered as well on behalf of his beloved believers and for Christ’s sake by enduring insults, hardships, and persecutions (2 Cor 11:23-28, 32-33; 12:10). He used his authority to build people up so that they would become pleasing to Christ (2 Cor 10:5, 8; 11:2; 12:19; 13:10). Paul and his coworker’s ministries were not done for financial gain, instead they were honest, fair, and prayerful (2 Cor 11:7-9; 12:13-18; 13:1, 7-8). The foundation of their service was love (2 Cor 11:11). It might appear to skeptics to be “weak” (2 Cor 10:1; 11:21, 29-30; 12:10; 13:9). But, as, Christ “was crucified in weakness, however, he lives out of the power of God; for also we ourselves are weak in him, but we will live with him out of the power of God for you” (2 Cor 13:4).

When I first finished college, I worked as a community organizer in Plainfield, New Jersey, helping Spanish-speaking people who needed assistance. They were limited because they did not know English sufficiently well and, being new to the United States, did not understand how to be well treated by others in the United States. The director of Community-Action Plainfield, Marcellus Smith, taught the staff how to help people by empowering them. Thus, we were to find them venues whereby they could become self-sufficient. What I learned helped me throughout my life and work because like Jesus and the Apostle Paul our goal was to build people up, not use people for our own financial gain, but rather serve them humbly and honestly and fairly. We did not try to rule over them but to rule with and for them and help them to learn to rule wisely.

In this era of perplexing actions and models, let us remember this basic principle: truly “strong” and “great” leadership is to work together with the people involved for a better future for them.

Aída

 

 




[1] “La República Dominicana nunca reconoció la legitimidad democrática del régimen de Maduro…El drama venezolano no es de un líder caído en desgracia, sino el de un país exhausto, empobrecido y fragmentado tras más de dos décadas de chavismo.” Editorial: La posición dominicana,” Día Libre (6 de enero 2026): 11. In a survey, Diario Libre discovered that 86.36% of its readers favored the capture of Nicolás Maduro; while 13.63% did not (11).

[2] “Chavismo” began in 1999 (“el chavismo cumple 27 años,” Diario Libre (3 de febrero 2026): 4.

[3] Melvin Gómez, “Delcy Rodriquez asume en Venezuela, ordena estado de excepción y arrestos,” Diario Libre (6 de enero 2026): 3.

[4] “Venezuela libera ‘número importante’ de presos por razones políticas,” Diario Libre (9 de enero 2026): 13.

[5] “De Noriega a Maduro: cuando el poder termina ante un tribunal de EE. UU.,” Diario Libre (6 de enero 2026): 5.

[6] The current president Delcy Rodriquez affirmed that Venezuela has the greatest amount of oil reserves in the world and the greatest amount of reserves of gas in this hemisphere” (“Venezuela tiene condiciones de ser una potencia petrolera,” El Dia (26 de enero 2026): 14. In 2023, China was its greatest purchaser of crude oil (68%); the U.S. was second (23%), and Spain was third (4%).

[7] “Trabajadores dominicanos entre los diez del área con el mayor salario mínimo,” Diario Libre (21 de enero 2026): 4. Dominican Republic has the tenth highest minimum wage in Latin America and the Caribbean at approximately $476/month.

[8] Adriano Espallat, “Opinion: Apoyar a Venezuela respetando la constitución de Estados Unidos,” (6 de enero 2026): 4.

[9] “EE.UU. podría gobernar Venezuela y extraer su petróleo durante años,” Diario Libre (9 de enero 2026): 14.

[10] “Trump contempla a Maria Corina en el futuro de Venezuela,” Diario Libre (21 de enero 2026), 12. Mexico also has a female president: Claudia Sheinbaum (“Mexico ayudará a Cuba con petróleo tras el corte venezolano,” Diario Libre (20 de enero 2026), 12. Violeta Chamarro is the first female democratically elected in Latin America (1990, Nicaragua); Laura Fernández Delgado is the second woman elected as president of Costa Rica (2026). Of course, Isabel Perón became “president” after her husband died in 1974 in Argentina. The Dominican Republic has a well-loved female vice-president, Raquel Peña. Other women have been presidents: Lidia Gueiler in Bolivia (1979), Mireya Moscoso in Panama (1999), Michelle Bachelet in Chile (2006, 2014), Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner in Argentina (2007), Laura Chinchilla in Costa Rica (2010), Dilma Rousseff in Brazil (2011), Xiomara Castro in Honduras (2022), and Dina Boluarte in Peru (2022). “Mujeres en la presidencia: avances, continuidades y retos que persisten,” Diario Libre (3 de febrero 2026): 12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_presidents_in_Latin_America

[11] All translations from the Greek New Testament and from the Spanish are by the author. See further on Jesus’s style of leadership Aída Besançon Spencer in “Biblical Equity and the Meaning of Servant Leadership” in The Quest for Gender Equity in Leadership: Biblical Teachings on Gender Equity and Illustrations of Transformation in Africa, edited by Keumju Jewel Hyun and Diphus C. Chemorion, House of Prisca and Aquila Series (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2016), 109-122; Aída Besançon Spencer and William David Spencer, “An Overview of the New Testament Teachings on Christian Egalitarian Leadership,” in Christian Egalitarian Leadership: Empowering the Whole Church according to the Scriptures, House of Prisca and Aquila Series (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2020), 3-25; Aída Besançon Spencer, 2 Corinthians, The People’s Bible Commentary (Abindon, UK: The Bible Reading Fellowship, 2001).

Friday, January 2, 2026

What Does Myanmar Have in Common with Massachusetts?

 Lum Gyung, wife Daung Naw, son Chris Gyung Khaung, and daughter Keziah Gyung Naw before Adoniram Judson’s home, 145 Main St., Malden, MA

 Myanmar, officially the Republic of the Union of Myanmar and formerly referred to as Burma (the official English name until 1989) is the largest country by area in Mainland Southeast Asia and has a population of about 55 million. About 6.2% claim to be Christian (United States Pew Research Center 2019). Myanmar is bordered by India and Bangladesh to the northwest, China to the northeast, Laos and Thailand to the east and southeast.[1] We were reminded last November when Lum Gyung from Myanmar came into the Boston campus of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in order to help Aida with  technical help for her New Testament Interpretation zoom class that Myanmar and Massachusetts are closely tied together today as they were in the past.

An important missionary to Myanmar was Adoniram Judson and his family. The founder of Gordon Divinity School was named after him at his birth, as Adoniram Judson Gordon. Adoniram Judson was born in 1788 (died in 1850) in MaldenMiddlesex County, Massachusetts. He was born to Abigail Brown and Adoniram Judson Sr., a Congregational minister. Judson Jr. attended the Andover Theological Seminary. In 1808, Judson "made a solemn dedication of himself to God." During his final year at the school, Judson decided upon a missionary career.[2]  

In 1810, Judson joined a group of mission-minded students who called themselves "The Brethren." These students inspired the establishment of America's first organized missionary society. Eager to serve abroad, Judson became convinced that "Asia with its idolatrous myriads, was the most important field in the world for missionary effort." He, and three other students from the seminary, appeared before the Congregationalists' General Association to appeal for support. In 1810, the elders voted to form the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. He was appointed by them as a missionary to the East. Judson was also commissioned by the Congregational Church, and married Ann Hasseltine on February 5, 1812. He was ordained the next day at the Tabernacle Church in Salem, MA. In 1813, Judson and his wife, Ann, moved to Burma. He was 25 years old. Judson served as an American Particular Baptist missionary in Burma for almost 40 years. His mission work with Luther Rice led to the establishment of the American Baptist Churches USA.

First attempts by the Judsons to interest the natives of Rangoon with the Gospel of Jesus met with almost total indifference. Buddhist traditions and the Burmese worldview at that time led many to disregard the pleadings of Adoniram and his wife to believe in one living and all-powerful God. Nevertheless, the first believer was baptized in 1819, and there were 18 believers by 1822. The progress of Christianity would continue to be slow with much risk of endangerment and death in the Burmese Empire. George H. Hough in 1817 produced the first published materials in Burmese that were printed in Burma, which included 800 copies of Judson's translation of the Gospel of Matthew. By 1823, ten years after his arrival, Judson finished the first draft of his translation of the New Testament in Burmese. When Judson finished translating the entire Bible into Burmese, it was printed and published in 1835.

Judson compiled the first ever Burmese-English dictionary (missionary E. A. Steven completed the English-Burmese half). Every dictionary and grammar written in Burma in the last two centuries has been based on those originally created by Judson. Though the Bible has been translated numerous times into Burmese, Judson's translation remains the most popular version in Myanmar.

Each July, Baptist churches in Myanmar celebrate "Judson Day," commemorating his arrival as a missionary. Inside the campus of Yangon University is Judson Church, named in his honor, and in 1920 Judson College, also named in his honor, merged into Rangoon College, which has since been renamed Yangon University.[3] 

Judson was the first missionary to make contact with the Karen people in 1827, when he ransomed and freed a debt-slave. This act of social justice then led to spiritual renewal of an individual and then a nation. The freed slave, Saw Ko Tha Byu, was an illiterate, surly man who spoke almost no Burmese and was reputed to be not only a thief, but also a murderer who admitted killing at least 30 men.

In 1828, the former Karen bandit was sent south with a new missionary couple, George and Sarah Boardman, into the territory of the strongly animistic, non-Buddhist Karen. Ko Tha Byu was no sooner baptized, when he set off into the jungle alone to preach to his fellow tribe members. Astonishingly, he found them prepared for his preaching. Their ancient oracle traditions, handed down for centuries, contained some startling echoes of the Old Testament so that some scholars conjecture a linkage with Jewish communities (or possibly even Nestorians), before their migrations from western China into Burma.

The core of what they called their "Tradition of the Elders" was a belief in one true God, unchangeable, eternal, all-powerful, creator of heaven and earth, of man, and of woman formed from a rib taken from the man. They believed in humanity's temptation by a devil in a garden, and its fall, and that some day a Great Messiah would come to its rescue. They lived in expectation of a prophecy that white foreigners would bring them a sacred parchment roll.[4]

By 2006, Myanmar had the third largest number of Baptists[5] worldwide, behind the United States and India. The majority of adherents are KarenKachin and Chin. The Karen population has spread around the world, to Thailand, United States, Australia, Canada, and India. Among the total 3,371,100 in Myanmar, an estimated 50% of Karen are Christian.[6]

The tribe to which Lum Gyung belongs is the Lhaovo ethnic group from the northern part of Myanmar (the Kachin State). He and his parents are Christians. His grandparents were converted from worship of their great-great grandfather’s spirit (Nat), who had died from the attack of a wild animal. Lum attends the Lynn Myanmar Christian fellowship, one of three Myanmar community churches in Massachusetts (two others are in Lowell and Boston).

Lum came to study at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, MA in 2023 and completed his Masters in Christian Ministries in 2026. He explains that: “Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (GCTS) is one of the best seminaries in the US which provides the best education for diverse ministry fields not only domestically but also internationally. In our country’s context, the GCTS alumni from Myanmar are most effective and successful missionaries and pastors nationwide, which means the seminary offers outstanding training.”

In 2024-25, these community churches dedicated themselves to purchase the home of Judson’s birthplace in order to preserve the heritage of the first missionary and Bible translator to the Myanmar (Burmese) people.[7] Judson’s motto was “devoted for life” and his biblical foundation came from Matthew 28:18-20: “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen” (KJV).

Judson dedicated his whole life for the people of Burma to see the Light, despite much hardship, heartbreak, suffering, losses, and great challenges. Judson was prepared by God and by his Christian family and friends in Malden, thus the house is a symbol of faith, dedication, sacrifice, love, and obeying God’s command to go to all nations to baptize and teach. As Jesus was with his early disciples in Jerusalem and throughout the ancient world and with Judson in Burma, so too he is present today with the Burmese descendants of those early converts to Christianity.

Aida with Lum Gyung

 

 



[1] “Myanmar,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myanmar.

[2] “Adoniram Judson,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoniram_Judson.

[3] Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoniram_Judson. See also Rosalie Hall Hunt, Bless God and Take Courage: The Judson History and Legacy (Valley Forge, PA: Judson, 2005).

[4] See Don Richardson, Eternity in Their Hearts, 3rd ed. (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, 2006), ch. 2.

[5]  The Karen Baptist Convention in 2025 notes that it has 337,682 baptized members, https://kbcm1913.org/.; About Us.

[6] There are many different Karen peoples in Myanmar. The two largest are the Sgaw Karen (2.1 million total pop.) and the Eastern Pwo Karen (1.2 million). Together, the World Christian Database reports they are 51% Christian. If you add in the other Karen peoples, the percentage drops closer to 30%. Gina A. Zurlo, ed. World Christian Database (Brill, accessed December 2025). “Karen people,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_people.

[7] “Ribbon-Cutting Celebrates Opening of Adoniram Judson Heritage Center,” City of Malden News, Posted on August 13, 2025, https://www.cityofmalden.org/m/newsflash/home/detail/1090; Leon H Abdalian, “Preserving History and Protecting Heritage,” https://www.judsonheritage.org/restoration.